Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Discover Islam, - Origin of birds and mammals















Evolutionists embark on flights of fancy of their own, while trying to justify how birds and mammals developed from amphibians
According to the theory of evolution, life originated and evolved in the sea and was then transported onto land by amphibians. This evolutionary scenario also suggests that amphibians evolved into reptiles, creatures living only on land. This scenario is implausible, due to the enormous structural differences between these two classes of animals. For instance, the amphibian egg is designed for developing on land. A “step by step” evolution of an amphibian is out of the question, because without a perfect and fully-designed egg, it is not possible for a species to survive. Moreover, as usual, there is no evidence of transitional forms that were supposed to link amphibians with reptiles. Evolutionist paleontologist and an authority on vertebrate paleontology, Robert L. Carroll has to accept that ‘the early reptiles were very different from amphibians and that their ancestors could not be found yet.'
Yet the hopelessly doomed scenarios of the evolutionists are far from over. There still remains the problem of making these creatures fly! Since evolutionists believe that birds must have somehow evolved from lower life-forms, they assert that they were transformed from reptiles. However, none of the unique mechanisms of birds, which have a completely different structure from land-dwelling animals, can be explained by gradual evolution. First of all, the wings -- which are the exceptional traits of birds -- pose a great impasse for evolutionists. One of the Turkish evolutionists, Engin Korur, confesses the impossibility of the evolution of wings:
"The common trait of the eyes and the wings is that they can only function if they are fully developed. In other words, a half-developed eye cannot see; a bird with half-formed wings cannot fly. How these organs came into being has remained one of the mysteries of nature that needs to be enlightened."
The question of how the perfect structure of wings came into being as a result of consecutive haphazard mutations remains completely unanswered. There is no way to explain how the front arms of a reptile could have changed into perfectly functioning wings as a result of a distortion in its genes )mutation(.
Moreover, just having wings is not sufficient for a land organism to fly. Land-dwelling organisms are devoid of many other structural mechanisms that birds use for flying. For example, the bones of birds are much lighter than those of land-dwelling organisms. Their lungs function in a very different way. They have a completely different muscular and skeletal system and an extremely specialized circulatory system. These features are pre-requisites for flying, at par in their importance with wings. All these mechanisms had to exist simultaneously, they could not have formed gradually by being “accumulated”. This is why the theory asserting that land organisms gradually evolved into aerial organisms is completely fallacious.
All of these bring another question to mind: even if we suppose this impossible story to be true, why are evolutionists unable to find any “half-winged” or “single-winged” fossils to back up their story?
Another alleged transitional form:Archaeopteryx
Evolutionists pronounce the name of a single creature in response. This is the fossil of a bird calledArchaeopteryxwhich is one of the most widely-known so-called transitional forms among the very few that evolutionists still defend. Considered the ancestor of modern birds by evolutionists,Archaeopteryxlived 150 million years ago. The theory holds that some of the small-scaled dinosaurs namedVelociraptororDromeosaurevolved by acquiring wings and then starting to fly. Thus,Archaeopteryxis assumed to be a transitional form that diverted from its dinosaur ancestors and started to fly for the first time.
However, the latest studies ofArchaeopteryxfossils indicate that this creature is absolutely not a transitional form, but a bird species bearing some characteristics distinct from today’s birds.
The thesis thatArchaeopteryxwas a “half-bird” that could not fly perfectly was popular among evolutionist circles until not long ago. The absence of a sternum )chest bone( in this creature, or at least the structural difference from flying birds, was held up as the most important evidence that this bird could not fly properly. )The chest bone is a bone found under the thorax on which the muscles required for flight are fastened. In our time, this chest bone is observed in all flying and non-flying birds, and even in bats – a flying mammal which belongs to a very different family(.
However, the seventhArchaeopteryxfossil found in 1992, caused great astonishment among evolutionists. The reason was that in this recently foundArchaeopteryxfossil, the chest bone that was assumed to be long missing by the evolutionists actually existed. This recently-found fossil was described inNaturemagazine as follows:
"The recently discovered seventh specimen of theArchaeopteryxpreserves a partial rectangular sternum, long suspected but never previously documented. This attests to its strong flight muscles."
This discovery invalidated the mainstay of the claims thatArchaeopteryxwas a half-bird that could not fly properly.
On the other hand, the structure of the bird’s feathers became one of the most important pieces of evidence verifying thatArchaeopteryxwas a flying bird in the real sense. The asymmetrical feather structure ofArchaeopteryxis indistinguishable from modern birds, indicating that the animal could fly perfectly. As the famous paleontologist Carl O. Dunbar states: “because of its feathersArchaeopteryxis distinctly to be classed as a bird”.
Another fact that was revealed by the structure ofArchaeopteryx’s feathers was the bird’s warm-blooded metabolism. As it is known, reptiles and dinosaurs are cold-blooded animals that are affected by environmental temperatures and are incapable of regulating their body heat independently. A very important function of the feathers in a bird is the maintenance of the animal’s body heat. The fact thatArchaeopteryxhad feathers showed that it was a real, warm-blooded bird that needed to maintain its body heat in contrast to the dinosaurs.




Regads, :-
NAJIMUDEEN M :-
[Editor & Publisher]

↓TRANSLATE THIS BLOG↓
IndonesiaArabicChinaEnglishSpanishFrenchItalianJapanKoreanHindiRussian

* Bulgarian ** Bengali ** Arabic ** Afrikaans ** Gujarati ** Greek ** German ** Georgian ** Italian ** Irish ** Hungarian ** Hebrew ** Hindi ** Hebrew ** Chinese (Traditional) ** Chinese (Simplified) ** Marathi ** Maltese ** Latin ** Lao *






ShareShare

Follow Us













*:- More than
Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah}Most Useful Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And Get Benifite!
{Improve Your GK & IQ} :- * Visit :-click here



Discover Islam, - The imaginary mechanism of evolution









*



The neo-Darwinist model, which we shall take as the “mainstream” theory of evolution today, argues that life has evolved through two naturalistic mechanisms: “natural selection” and “mutation”. The basic assertion of the theory is as follows: Natural selection and mutation are two complementary mechanisms. The origin of evolutionary modifications are random mutations that take place in the genetic structure of living things. The traits brought about by mutations are selected by the mechanism of natural selection and this is the means by which living things evolve.
When we further probe into this theory, we find that there is no such evolutionary mechanism at all, because neither natural selection nor mutations make any contribution to the claim that different species have evolved and transformed into one another.
Natural selection is a natural process
As process of nature, natural selection was familiar to biologists beforeDarwin, who defined it as a “mechanism that keeps species unchanging without being corrupted”.Darwinwas the first person to put forward the assertion that this process had evolutionary power, and on the basis of this assumption he erected his entire theory of evolution. The name he gave to his book indicates that natural selection was the basis ofDarwin’s theory:''The Origin of Species, by means of Natural Selection… ''
However sinceDarwin’s time, there has not been a single shred of evidence put forward to show that natural selection causes living beings to evolve. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at theMuseumofNatural HistoryinEngland, who is also a prominent evolutionist, stresses that natural selection has never been observed to have the power to cause things to evolve:
''No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever got near it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this question.''
Natural selection holds the view that those living things which are more suited to the natural conditions of their habitats will prevail by having offspring that will survive, whereas those that are unfit will disappear. For example, in a deer herd under the threat of wild animals, naturally those that can run faster will survive. That is true. But no matter how long this process goes on, it will not transform those deer into another living species. The deer will always remain deer.
When we look at the few incidents the evolutionists have put forth as observed examples of natural selection, we see that these are nothing but a simple attempt to hoodwink.
“Industrial melanism”
In 1986, Douglas Futuyman published a book,The Biology of Evolution, which is accepted as one of the sources explaining the theory of evolution by natural selection in the most explicit way. The most famous of his examples on this subject is about the colour of the moth population, which appeared to darken during the Industrial Revolution inEngland.
According to the account, around the outset of the Industrial Revolution inEngland, the colour of the tree barks aroundManchesterwas quite light. Because of this, dark-colored moths resting on those trees could easily be noticed by the birds that fed on them and therefore they had very little chance of survival. Fifty years later, as a result of pollution, the barks of the trees had darkened and this time light-colored moths became the most hunted. As a result, the number of light-colored moths decreased whereas that of the dark-colored ones increased since the latter were not easily noticed. On the one hand, evolutionists use this as an important evidence to prove their theory. On the other hand, they take refuge in obscurantism by window-dressing the questions regarding how the light–colored moths “evolved” into dark-colored ones.
It should be quite clear that this example can in no way be used as evidence for the theory of evolution, because natural selection gave rise to a new form that had not existed before. Dark colored moths existed in the moth population before the Industrial Revolution. Only the relative proportions of the existing moth varieties in the population changed. The moths had notacquired a new trait or an organ, which would cause a ‘speciation'. In order to have a moth turn into another living species, a bird for example, new additions would have had to be made to the genes. That is, an entirely separate genetic program would have had to be loaded to include information about the physical traits of the bird.
Briefly, natural selection does not have the capability to add a new organ to a living organism, remove one, or change the organism into another species – quite contrary to the image that evolutionists conjure up. The “greatest” evidence put forward sinceDarwinhas been able to go no further than the “industrial melanism” of the moths inEngland.
Can natural selection explain complexity?
There is nothing that natural selection contributes to the theory of evolution, because this mechanism can never increase or improve the genetic information of a species. Neither can it transform one species into another: a starfish into a fish, a fish into a frog, a frog into a crocodile or a crocodile into a bird. The biggest defender of punctuated equilibrium, Gould, refers to this deadlock of natural selection as follows:
"The essence of Darwinism lies in a single phrase:natural selection is the creative force of evolutionary change. No one denies that natural selection will play a negative role in eliminating the unfit. Darwinian theories require that it create the fit as well. "
Another of the misleading methods that evolutionists employ on the issue of natural selection is their effort to present this mechanism as a 'conscious designer'. However, natural selection has no consciousness. It does not possess a will that can decide what is good and what is bad for living beings. As a result, natural selection cannot explain biological systems and organs that have the feature of “irreducible complexity”. These systems and organs are composed of the co-operation of a great number of parts and they are of no use if even one of these parts is missing or defective. )For example, the human eye does not function unless it exists with all its details(. Therefore, the will that brings all these parts together should be able to figure the future in advance and aim directly for the benefit that is to be acquired at the last stage.
Since natural mechanism has no consciousness or will, it can do no such thing. This fact which demolishes the foundations of the theory of evolution, also worriedDarwin: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.''
Natural selection only selects out the disfigured, weak or unfit individuals of a species. That is, it cannot make anything evolve.Darwinaccepted this reality by saying: “Natural selection can do nothing until favourable variations chance to occur.” This is why neo-Darwinism has had to elevate mutations next to natural selection as the “cause of beneficial changes.” However as we shall see, mutations can only be “the cause for harmful changes.”



Regads, :-
NAJIMUDEEN M :-
[Editor & Publisher]

↓TRANSLATE THIS BLOG↓
IndonesiaArabicChinaEnglishSpanishFrenchItalianJapanKoreanHindiRussian

* Bulgarian ** Bengali ** Arabic ** Afrikaans ** Gujarati ** Greek ** German ** Georgian ** Italian ** Irish ** Hungarian ** Hebrew ** Hindi ** Hebrew ** Chinese (Traditional) ** Chinese (Simplified) ** Marathi ** Maltese ** Latin ** Lao *






ShareShare

Follow Us













*:- More than
Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah}Most Useful Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And Get Benifite!
{Improve Your GK & IQ} :- * Visit :-click here



Qur'an Related, - Our Prophet (saas) predicted his own death




Another of our blessed Prophet's (saas) miracles was that all of his predictions came true (or will come true) in time. One of the events he predicted was his own death.
The Messenger of Allah (saas) looked at us and said: "You suggest that I shall be the last to die. Be warned, I shall die before all of you! You will die after me." 85
Narrated 'Uqbah ibn 'Amir (ra):
The Prophet went out and offered the funeral prayer for the martyrs of the (battle of) Uhud. He then ascended the minbar and said: "I will precede you (in death), and I am a witness against you, and – by Allah! – I am at this moment gazing upon my pond. I have been given the keys of the treasuries of Earth" – or "the treasuries of Earth" – "and – by Allah! – I do not fear that you will become idolaters after me, but I fear that you will compete for them [the treasuries]." 86
In another hadith, our Prophet (saas) reveals that he is going to die:
Abu Muwyahibah narrated: The Messenger of Allah called for me in the middle of the night and said to me: "O Abu Muwayhibah, I have been ordered to pray for forgiveness for the people of Baqi' [graveyard], so come with me." So I went with him. When he stood among them, he said: "Peace be upon you, O dwellers of the graves. May the situation you are in be more comfortable than the situation the people are in, for tribulations have approached like dark patches of night, one following another, and each one is worse than the one before it." Then he drew near to me and said: "O Abu Muwayhibah, I have been given the keys to the treasures of the world and to lasting life in it, followed by the Garden. I was given a choice between this and the meeting with my Lord and the Garden, so I chose the meeting with my Lord." 87
Our Prophet (saas) gave many details about his death, and this greatly increased and deepened the believers' faith. For example:
I was born on a Monday. The revelation began on a Monday. I migrated [to Madinah] on a Monday, and shall die on a Monday. 88
Ibn Hanbal and al-Bayhaqi relate from Ibn Abbas (ra):
Ibn Abbas narrated: "The Prophet (saas) was born on a Monday, became a prophet on a Monday, migrated from Mecca on a Monday, and entered Madinah on a Monday. Mecca was opened [to Islam] on a Monday, and he died on a Monday."89
In some of the hadiths, he revealed where he would die:
The place to which I migrated and where I shall lie – where I shall be buried when I die – is Madinah. 90Madinah is where I emigrated. I shall die there and there be raised up. 91












Regads, :-
NAJIMUDEEN M :-
[Editor & Publisher]

↓TRANSLATE THIS BLOG↓
IndonesiaArabicChinaEnglishSpanishFrenchItalianJapanKoreanHindiRussian

* Bulgarian ** Bengali ** Arabic ** Afrikaans ** Gujarati ** Greek ** German ** Georgian ** Italian ** Irish ** Hungarian ** Hebrew ** Hindi ** Hebrew ** Chinese (Traditional) ** Chinese (Simplified) ** Marathi ** Maltese ** Latin ** Lao *






ShareShare

Follow Us













*:- More than
Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah}Most Useful Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And Get Benifite!
{Improve Your GK & IQ} :- * Visit :-click here



Qur'an Related, - Our Prophet (saas) gave answers before anyone asked the questions




Allah reveals in the Qur'an that the Prophet Jesus (as) told people what they had eaten and had stored up (Surah Al 'Imran: 49) and that the Prophet Joseph (as) said that "no meal to feed you will arrive before I have informed you what they [the dreams] mean" (Surah Yusuf: 37). As our Prophet (saas) said, he could miraculously answer a question before it was asked and could know a person's inner thoughts. For example, he told his Companions what cities would be conquered and when. 79The hadiths also state that he knew when people were going to come home and who was going to enter a room. When a person returned late from somewhere, our Prophet (saas) could tell him the reason why he was late. 80 Our Prophet (saas) immediately knew when wicked thoughts passed through an unbeliever's mind and those who thought ill of Muslims. 81
The hadiths contain hundreds of such examples. For example, our Prophet (saas) answered a question that Abu Sufyan ibn al-Harith (ra) had been pondering:
Abu Sufyan would sit in a corner of the mosque. One day the Prophet (saas) eft his house, wrapped up in his cloak. From where he was sitting, Abu Sufyan said: "I wonder how he was victorious." The Prophet (saas) approached him, tapped him on the back, and said: "I defeated you with Allah's help." Abu Sufyan said: "I bear witness that you are the Messenger of Allah." 82
One hadith about Wabisa (ra) shows how our Prophet (saas) could understand and answer a person's silent question:
Wabisah ibn Ma`bad said: I came to the Messenger of Allah, and he said: "You have come to ask about devoutness (birr)?" I replied: "Yes." He said: "Ask your heart for a judgment. Devoutness is that toward which the self is tranquil and toward which the heart is tranquil. Impiety (ithm) is that which becomes agitated in the self and it goes agitatedly to and fro in the breast even though people repeatedly give you a judgment [as to a matter's permissibility]." 83
The hadiths also tell us that he knew a person's question before it was even asked. For example:
Abu'd-Darda was worshipping an idol. Abdullah ibn Rawahah and Abu Salamah went and broke it. When Abu'd-Darda came and saw the idol in that state, he could not refrain from asking [it]: "Aren't you ashamed? Couldn't you have defended yourself?" Later he came to the Prophet (saas). Ibn Rawahah saw him on the way and said: "This is Abu'd-Darda. He must have come to look for us!" The Prophet said: "No, he is coming to embrace Islam. My Lord promised that he would become a Muslim." 84
All of the above examples show that our Prophet (saas), by Allah's will, performed many miracles. With this excellent moral character, consciousness of Allah, and deep faith, sincerity, and trust in Him, he was an example to all Muslims. Through these miracles, he strengthened and encouraged the believers.












Regads, :-
NAJIMUDEEN M :-
[Editor & Publisher]

↓TRANSLATE THIS BLOG↓
IndonesiaArabicChinaEnglishSpanishFrenchItalianJapanKoreanHindiRussian

* Bulgarian ** Bengali ** Arabic ** Afrikaans ** Gujarati ** Greek ** German ** Georgian ** Italian ** Irish ** Hungarian ** Hebrew ** Hindi ** Hebrew ** Chinese (Traditional) ** Chinese (Simplified) ** Marathi ** Maltese ** Latin ** Lao *






ShareShare

Follow Us













*:- More than
Thousand(10,000) {Masha Allah}Most Useful Articles!, In Various Topics!! :- Read And Get Benifite!
{Improve Your GK & IQ} :- * Visit :-click here